The same data, three times
An order arrives by email, gets typed into a spreadsheet, then typed again into the accounts. Nobody designed it that way. It accumulated, one reasonable decision at a time.
Business process review
The re-typing, the chasing, the software nobody has opened in months: it all costs money, and most owners have never worked out how much. We put a figure on it, show the arithmetic behind that figure, and then design the system that stops it.
You just have not been given a number for it. These are the three we find in almost every company that has outgrown its spreadsheets.
An order arrives by email, gets typed into a spreadsheet, then typed again into the accounts. Nobody designed it that way. It accumulated, one reasonable decision at a time.
Work is tracked across documents that one or two people really understand. Ask where a particular job has got to and somebody loses an afternoon finding out.
Seats for people who left. Two tools doing one job. A platform bought for a single feature. It leaves your account every month whether anyone opens it or not.
A process audit checks whether you are following your own rules. That is a different job, and not a useful one if the rules are the problem. We are looking for something else: the places where the work is slow or expensive, and the places where a system should be doing it instead.
Both are covered by the review fee. The second only exists when building something is genuinely worth it.
Where your time and money are going, task by task. What each one costs a year, how we arrived at that, and which of them are worth changing first.
What the system would do, screen by screen: what each one captures, what it updates and who it tells. It is detailed enough for any competent developer to quote from without re-interviewing your staff, and it carries an indicative cost so you can weigh the build against the saving.
You own both documents. If you would rather somebody else built it, take them to whoever you like. They are written to be used that way on purpose.
Nothing begins until you have agreed a fixed number. There is no hourly billing and no open-ended engagement.
Free, 30 minutes
What is going wrong, which part of the business to look at, and how much of your team's time we would need. No preparation required.
A few days later
A price range and a timescale, in writing. Enough for you to decide whether this is worth continuing, before anyone has committed to anything.
Before any work
We go through the detail, then quote one exact number. You know the full cost before we start, and it does not move.
Two to three weeks
We sit with your team while they work, pull the volumes from your systems, and come back with the documents and a walkthrough call.
Most people have never commissioned a review like this and cannot picture what arrives at the end of it. So we published a worked example: a fictional wholesale business, one observed task, the volumes, the arithmetic, and what we would have recommended.
The quiet worry about bringing someone in to watch your staff is that it looks like the prelude to cutting them. So, plainly:
A review is only as good as the records behind it. Some businesses cannot answer basic questions about their own operations: how many jobs they did last month, how long those took, what they earned. That is its own piece of work, and you can buy it on its own.
That is a separate engagement with a separate quote. The review is a finished product on its own, and it is not a deposit on anything.
There is no list price, because a six-person company and a sixty-person company are not the same job. What we can promise is the shape: a free call, then an estimated range, then one fixed number agreed before any work starts. No hourly billing, and no invoice you did not see coming.
No. If the answer is to cancel eleven unused seats and move one spreadsheet into a tool that costs forty pounds a month, that is what the report says. Where several options are reasonable we lay them out and let you choose. It is the cheap recommendations that make the expensive ones worth believing.
Yes, and it is written so that you can. The solution proposal is detailed enough for someone else to quote from without re-interviewing your staff. If a competitor gives you a better price on the same specification, take it.
Remotely, anywhere English-speaking. Desk work is entirely observable over a screen share, and we work your hours rather than ours. We also work on-site in South Africa and with English-speaking businesses in Korea.
It happens, and we would rather find out early. Often we can count a week of real transactions by hand and extrapolate, which is cheaper and more accurate than fixing the system that failed to record them. Where that is not enough, we will tell you in the first week and propose reporting work as a separate piece.
About 45 minutes with each person whose work we review, usually spread across a week and usually while they are working rather than in a meeting. You will not lose a fortnight of productivity to it.
Tell us roughly what is going on. We reply within one business day and set up 30 minutes at a time that suits you. Pick whatever hour works where you are and we will make it work.